Figma vs Illustrator: Which Produces Better SVG?
Both tools export SVG, but the output quality, code cleanliness, and workflow differences are significant.
SVG Export Quality Comparison
The quality and cleanliness of SVG output differs between tools.
| SVG Aspect | Figma | Illustrator |
|---|---|---|
| Code cleanliness | Very clean — minimal attributes | Heavier — more metadata |
| Precision (decimals) | Limited control | Full control (0–8 places) |
| Font handling | Outlines text | Full control |
| CSS vs inline styles | Presentation attributes | Configurable |
| Responsive SVG | Good | Full control |
When to Use Each Tool
Both are industry-standard; choose based on your primary design workflow.
- UI/UX design to SVG: Figma — purpose-built for screen design, clean SVG output
- Print and brand identity: Illustrator — CMYK support, precise output control
- Collaboration: Figma — browser-based, real-time collaboration
- AI/EPS compatibility: Illustrator — native format, full ecosystem compatibility
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Figma produce clean SVG code?
Yes — Figma's SVG export is among the cleanest of any design tool. It uses presentation attributes, minimal grouping, and produces small, readable SVG files.
Which tool is better for CSS-animated SVG?
Figma for designing the SVG; the animation is added in code. Illustrator's export gives more control over element IDs needed for CSS animation targeting.
Can I import Figma SVG into Illustrator?
Yes — Figma-exported SVG opens cleanly in Illustrator. The paths and colors are fully editable.
Which is cheaper for SVG work?
Figma has a free tier with full SVG export. Illustrator requires an Adobe subscription (~$55/month).
Does either tool support SVG 2.0 features?
Neither Figma nor Illustrator fully export SVG 2.0 features. Both target SVG 1.1 compatibility.
Related guides
Ready to Convert Your Image to SVG?
Free online converter — no sign-up, no watermarks, results in under 3 seconds.
Convert Image to SVG — Free